.” , for example. Or the latest hilarious episode of Documentary Now, "."
But when I think of that word, I think about how many tech giants really don’t give a “that word” about their customers. Now you might say “hey, didn’t Google just of forcing their employees to arbitrate all disputes in private, rigged arbitration systems?” Yes they did - after an vigorous and perilous effort by their employees. Writes Bloomberg:
The shift is a victory for Google employees who’ve been on several fronts, including workplace harassment, the treatment of contract workers and what kind of work the company does for government and military groups. The Mountain View, California-based company won’t require third-parties that employ sub-contracted staff for Google to institute the same changes, though. About half of those in Google’s total workforce official employees of the company.
But it’s something, and it’s something the rest of the tech industry has not yet done (not to mention every other industry.)
But then again, how many times have you clicked “I have read and agreed to the Terms of Service” before conducting your latest online transaction, without any idea that the company just forced you, their loyal customer, into these same kind of "forced arbitration" agreements? That means you can’t sue them in court if, say, they use your personal data illegally or otherwise violate your privacy. Public Citizen put together “Forced Arbitration Rogues Gallery,” so you can see some of the companies that make you "agree" to this. (Check out too, which cites a 2011 class action lawsuit that might be far more difficult to bring today over Google’s current products. The case, In re Google Buzz Privacy Litigation, led to an $8 million settlement with Gmail users “arising out of Google’s disclosure of personally identifiable information without authorization through the defunct site, Google Buzz.”)
We all know that tech companies do a terrible job protecting your privacy and can’t be trusted to self-regulate. That’s why last year, California enacted the California Consumer Protection Act, the strongest privacy law in the nation. by Consumer Watchdog:
It would, for instance, allow a private right of action – though with some limits -- in data breach cases. No such right currently exists. The law ensures:
The right of Californians to know what personal information is being collected about them.
The right of Californians to know whether their personal information is sold or disclosed and to whom.
The right of Californians to say no to the sharing or sale of personal information.
The right of Californians to access their personal information.
The right of Californians to equal service and price, even if they exercise their privacy rights.
That businesses cannot sell personal information of consumers under the age of 16 without explicit consent.
Tech companies like Google fought this law, but they lost. And they are likely to lose again when California moves to close up certain loopholes in last year’s legislation, problems made clear by the recent massive Starwoods/Marriott hack. Specifically, the “expand the requirements for companies to notify users or customers if their passport and government ID numbers, along with biometric data, such as fingerprints, and iris and facial recognition scans, have been stolen.”
As Neema Singh Guliani, senior legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, in the Washington Post,
But , “companies like Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google are pushing hard for federal digital privacy legislation in 2019, and not quite out of the goodness of their hearts. … Central to all these proposals is the notion that a federal bill should preempt any statewide legislation—like, say, California's—from taking effect.” have already been floated. ” that would not only preempt state laws, but :
…every other existing piece of federal privacy legislation, including landmark laws like Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Every sector- or issue-specific privacy law would be removed, and state and local lawmakers would be unable to draft stricter, more specific regulations in the future.…
The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) would be one of the repealed laws. It was authored by Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) in the late ‘90s, and IT was one of the first pieces of legislation governing the collection of data. The law imposes requirements on companies when it comes to collecting data on children under 13 years of age, which has become a sticking point for a number of tech companies. Both and have been sued multiple times for violating COPPA, and the law is one of the main reasons many web services cut off at age 13.
“As Congress works to provide the American people with a comprehensive federal privacy law, we should build upon—not dismantle—existing safeguards,” Markey said, responding to ITIF’s proposal. “Getting rid of COPPA is literally like throwing the baby out with the bath water.”
Babies? What in the world does Google care about babies?